| PROF |
COMPOSITION |
SCORE |
Themes/ Melodies |
Orchestr. |
Harmon. |
Develop. |
My taste |
Originality |
REVIEWER
COMMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B |
Josh's Rag |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A |
Bach Fantasy |
7.60 |
|
|
|
|
7.60 |
|
An
uninteresting approach to fugue / contrapuntal writing: there is no clear
theme that gets dutifully stated by each instrument, nor is there a proper
development. Too homogenous, with
absolutely no straying from quarter/eighth notation. Perhaps would be better as a prelude, and
J.S. in fact did a much better job at spelling his name in his last
contrapunctus (re: Die Kunst die
Fuge). Too bad he died before
completing it. A worthy effort, and
you start to show promise at around m.112 - - THAT is what you need to
sustain throughout, and the trick is to remain consistent while making the
other parts do wilder and independent things themselves - i.e., 16th/32nd
note runs, syncopated accompaniment, or outright tunes by themselves so that
you've got two pieces that can play both by themselves AND together. These are just some ideas and
suggestions. Keep writing, and make
the effort to breathe more life and excitement into a piece whose style is
often misinterpreted to be stodgy and clock-like. In the hands of a Bach, it's more a salute
to the spinning atoms that comprised both us and the music we hear. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C |
Rozhnik |
7.60 |
|
|
|
|
7.60 |
|
Well,
finally a real melody - and completely uninspired accompaniment. Simple, easy to listen to, but is in
desparate need of more development. I
love the melody, and with the author's kind permission, I'd like to
orchestrate in myself. Drop me a line
if that would be ok... ok? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B |
A Little Weird Song |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B |
Edit J. Forever |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A |
Symphony C minor mov
1 |
7.80 |
|
|
|
|
7.80 |
|
little
comment, except to say that your efforts are appreciated. Too long, though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| D |
Symphonydenada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A |
Trio Opus 44 |
8.00 |
|
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
"Have
klesmer, will travel..." Very fun
to listen to, even though at times I got very tired of hearing the
"chromaticism-as-theme" approach.
Inventive and clever counter-melodies, properly syncopated. Say, you're not from France, are you? I could've sworn I saw an organ-grinder's
monkey jumping from stave to stave...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A |
Concerto 53 |
7.80 |
|
|
|
|
7.80 |
|
*
yawn * Excellent form, adherence to
style, a thorough knowledge of how strings ought to accompany solo
instruments - - and completely unoriginal in it's execution. The last movement is practically a complete
rewrite of one of Mozart's Horn Concertos in E-flat, and while this is an
impressive achievement in it's own right, it does little to impress my sense
of originality. Pretty? Absolutely.
Great? No more than Salieri was
great when stacked up next to Wolfie. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A |
Piano Sonata 3 |
8.00 |
|
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
Beethovenesque
in style and scope, it's fairly good - and actually playable to boot. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C |
Brandenberg Echoes |
8.00 |
|
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
J.S.Bach
on a rather heavy thorazine drip.
Lordy, the spectre of originality must rear it's ugly head here: if there's anyone who can appreciate the
work and attention to detail that went into this work, it's me - and, in
spite of the nifty tools at our disposal to basically "suck up"
into our sequencers virtually any music at all (which we can then edit /
change / enhance), there is still much going on here to be appreciated. Unfortunately, in order to really
appreciate it, one must be a raging schizophrenic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C |
The Lost Flamenco |
9.60 |
|
|
|
|
9.60 |
|
Another
gem! Odd pitch bending at times, but
brilliant stereo effects, as well as excellent use of background percussive
accompaniment. And it's in authentic
flamenco style! Great! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A |
Journey |
8.50 |
|
|
|
|
8.50 |
|
Radio
Afghanistan? LOL - loved the
Middle-Eastern flavor, effective use of timpani / percussion, and astonishing
propensity for chords chocked with more dissonance than a beef slaughterhouse
in Wisconsin. Very thoughtfully done,
and therefore good. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B |
The Blue Sea |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C |
Freddy's Morning
Daybreak |
8.00 |
|
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
Nice
little tone-poem, short and sweet.
Some of the tracks need to be heard more, but otherwise completely
inoffensive. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C |
The Depot |
7.00 |
|
|
|
|
7.00 |
|
no
comment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B |
Day Dream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B |
Yukon Territory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C |
Final Battle |
8.20 |
|
|
|
|
8.20 |
|
Fun
as hell to listen to - did you catch those James Bondian chordal
progressions? LOL - fun and talented
use of drums, and the start/stop syncopation really gets your blood
going. Good work!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C |
Opening Fire |
7.60 |
|
|
|
|
7.60 |
|
"Mike
Connors as MANNIX!" LOL - fun,
but predictable. I've heard similar in
DOS-based computer games. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B |
Spanish Impressions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C |
Never Forgotten |
7.40 |
|
|
|
|
7.40 |
|
Hmmmm...
right up there with the moving - yet canned - accompanying music to
patriotic, quasi-religious commercials, complete with the Mormon Tabernacle
choir and tubular bells. Just my
opinion, but too sappy for my tastes.
High marks for great crescendos. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B |
When I Dream of You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A |
Trio Fugue in G minor |
8.80 |
|
|
|
|
8.80 |
|
Not
bad! The part writing reminds me of
Mozart's efforts in the same genre - which, on the face of it, sounds like a
huge compliment, until you find out that fugue-writing was one of things that
he ultimately sucked at. Again, in
fugal treatments, once you've gotten out of the gate with your three or four
statements of the theme, you MUST develop it, not just pass the theme from
voice to voice - and in the development, there must be a strong
counter-theme, and it must have more going on than quarter / eighth notes,
however oddly syncopated these may be.
With your kind permission, I'd like to illustrate what I'm talking
about by writing my own perception of a fugue with your undeniably striking
theme. Drop me a line if that would be
ok... ok? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A |
Introit and Kyrie |
7.80 |
|
|
|
|
7.80 |
|
no
comment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A |
Violin Concert 1, mov
1 |
7.75 |
|
|
|
|
7.75 |
|
Not
very interesting to me until around m.57, and then you lapse back into those
extraordinarily boring chord progressions.
Another moment of brilliance at m.94, which you were able to sustain
quite a bit longer. The finish on open
4ths was a crashing disappointment.
Surely you can properly finish this work? PLEASE???
It has fantastic potential, but needs much work, especially with those
pesky chords that I just KNOW were your attempt at evoking a sense of
grandeur - but that's not going to happen if the part-writing doesn't improve. There's very good reason why parallel 5ths,
crossing voices, and hackneyed, repeated C-major chords are verboten.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B |
Will you be my
Valentine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A |
Opus 11 v2002 |
7.40 |
|
|
|
|
7.40 |
|
Again,
too homogenous, essentially basic part writing. You were onto something good at m.140, and
if you could've kept up that level of activity (particularly with the clever
use of triplets against an almost contrapuntal countermelody), it would've
made a much stronger piece. Why are so
many folks afraid of getting their feet wet with a melody? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B |
Spinnaker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A |
2nd Symphony, vivace |
9.60 |
|
|
|
|
9.60 |
|
I
bet I know who wrote this - and it deserves a huge round of applause. I hear interesting orchestrations, playful
Prokofiev-like melodies, excellent development, with a "free-form"
approach that still retains a good deal of form and structure. Many surprises, outstanding build-ups and
denouements. LOVED the fugato at
measure 169 or so. Some of the
instruments (bassoon, flute - probably because of my soundfont) were out of
range, but very, very well done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C |
Under Attack |
7.90 |
|
|
|
|
7.90 |
|
no
comment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A |
Forty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| D |
Wiraqcha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A |
Flight of Fancy |
9.50 |
|
|
|
|
9.50 |
|
Almost
perfect. THIS, in fact, is "music
without pretension."
Extraordinarily pleasant to listen to, makes no other demands upon the
listener other than to forget about how complex and well-constructed other
pieces are - and that's not easy to achieve.
Laden with simplicity and purity of expression, it sets a modest goal
for itself and hits the bullseye dead center.
Written well within the range of the instrument (I wish I had spent
more time learning how to write for the guitar in my last piece - it might've
sounded as good), it beautifully transports the listener to a different time
and place. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TOTAL AVERAGE |
8.09 |
#DIV/0! |
#DIV/0! |
#DIV/0! |
#DIV/0! |
8.09 |
#DIV/0! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|